Archive for March 2010

Consultant Thursdays: No, You Can’t Pick My Brain.

The original post is from Nicole Jordan, a Public Relations and Marketing consultant out of Los Angeles that I’ve had the pleasure of meeting, and she a great asset in the tech culture there. She writes a blog called Kicking Sand, but more importantly, wrote this blog post over at BlogHer.

The reason I cross-posted the post: I work as a consultant and her post resonated with me. I don’t have the luxury of depending on a full-time job for the paycheck and do volunteer work.

I get requests to help people out, whether it’s setting up a website, doing a usability study, or connecting someone at a company (“Hey, do you know someone at…”).

It’s rather frustrating because my work has real value (the work I do is for the largest corporations in the world), and I have proved countless times it leads to better user experiences, tangible business goals and real results. That’s what I do.

The best way to describe me is my job is to “come up with shit.” I come up with ideas. Some good. A lot bad. But hopefully one will take hold and have a value much larger than the cost of hiring me, and that’s why I get work.  And lot of the time, the requests are for more than the idea: building out the website, an offering of partnership, the promise of a connection that may never pan out.

But here’s the rub.

Sweat equity doesn’t pay my rent.  volunteer projects doesn’t pay my rent. Promises don’t pay my rent. Cups of coffee don’t pay my rent.

Consulting and ideas do. I practically guarantee good results, and that has real value in today’s results-driven culture.

It reminds me of a quote from Mad Men. The Conrad Hilton character was asking the Don Draper character for free ideas.

Don said, “Connie, this is  my profession, what do you want me to do?”

Here’s Nicole’s post. Read on.

I was reminded of this post, which has sat in a Word doc on my desktop for two months, while reading “Can I Pick your Brain,” by Kevin Dugan. Thanks, Kevin, for inspiring me to finally get it posted.

I'm not sure where to start with this topic, because I feel like it might offend many people who know me who have asked the very thing.

For close personal friends, I can make an exception, but there has to be a line drawn somewhere.

Several years ago, I had upgraded myself to first class on a flight from LA to NYC, where I was living at the time. As the plane was boarding, I was flipping through the current issue of Wired. Highlighted in the magazine was a book called "Ambitchous" (has since been changed). It was, ultimately, about how the female psyche can hold one back in business. How we can under-value and under-appreciate what we contribute and our desire to not push too hard or ask for too much because we don’t want to be “the Bitch.” The author interviewed hundreds of women and is a career psychologist of sorts, as well as having a strong background in business.

I felt a tap on my shoulder, and it was my travel partner handing me a note. I opened it and it said: "Turn to page 76. That's my book."

It was the author, Debra Condren (@debracondren) of Ambitchous, seated directly across the aisle from me. The author of the book I just dog-eared a magazine page for to remind myself to buy.

I immediately got up and went to her and engaged in conversation that continued some during the flight and finally into the baggage terminal at JFK. She gave me a galley copy of the book, which I found a huge honor. I devoured it. There were so many eye-opening examples that simulated behaviors and ways of thinking that I'd found myself trapped in. But one chapter hit me the most.

I like to call it “Pay Me.” I would cite it, but I loaned the book out ages ago to other powerful females I know but my takeaway was this: Time is valuable, and creative thought is even more so. Don't undervalue either. As women (and compassionate people everywhere), we like to help and can get trapped in giving our time and ideas away for free because we’re afraid to ask for compensation. Or just don’t realize it’s within our right to do so.

When you are a creative individual who is a "popcorn machine," as my mom says, who spits out ideas on a continual basis, doling out advice is no big thing. It's easy to have coffee with someone whose company I enjoy, most who will ultimately take my ideas and somehow help benefit their business. Whatevs.

I used to do this a lot more than I do now, because here's the thing that I finally came to terms with that helped me start standing my ground: My popcorn machine has value.

Creative ideas and connections are the real currency in this digital economy. We are bombarded with fragmented channels to communicate with, audiences to communicate to and many masters to serve on the business side. Having someone who can view this entire ecosystem, understand your market and then advise you on what is wisest for your company to build brand and business is an invaluable resource. But those advisers are typically under-appreciated and under-monetized.

I am asked on a weekly basis to meet with people for coffee or lunch or cocktails. Requests range from asking if I know someone for a position to resources for an interest to the need for creative advice and consulting to helping to promote an event. There are a lot of needs in LA (and beyond), and it shows this industry is raring to go and bursting with ambition. But, I can't help everyone.

I do have my own work schedule and my "life balance" that I attempt, and they leave me little free time to "donate" to others. I appreciate that I am seen as a resource for the community, but some of the requests have shown me a repeated trend — people need ideas. A lot of them.

Strategic and creative counsel is one of the most under-monetized aspects of being in the communications and marketing business. Would you ask a lawyer to coffee to "pick his brain?" Do you think a professional — as ruthless as they are known to be, and whose services are enlisted regularly and paid well for — would dole out an hour of advice to you for $3.50? Unless he's your dear friend, what's in it for him?

I see this as an increasing problem in LA and I'm sure in every city across the country. It’s especially rampant with start-ups. Let's call it the "Pick Your Brain (PYB) syndrome."

You meet a nice smart person at an event, and you have coffee, and then they start to PYB. And take notes, because what you say makes sense. You are pumping out advice and ideas. And it ain't no thing to you, because you're a popcorn machine, right? Pop, pop, pop. And they soak it up and then off they go, and you’re left holding an empty drink.

I got into a recent Twitter back-and-forth with someone about the value of releasing ideas into the world. Someone cited @jason to me: that you can give ideas, but it doesn't matter if they can't execute (I'm paraphrasing), but I wholly disagree. When you present an idea to people and they recognize it as good, they will take it with them, and they will eventually make money off of that idea. But you will not.

So this is what I started doing, especially for people that I do not know well: I tell them I am happy to meet, I am flattered they asked, and that because my time is valuable I don’t do these PYB sessions for free. Most the times when I’ve said this, they’ve understood and honored it. The ones that got a little ruffled are the ones who will suck you dry and likely leave you paying for your own coffee. And theirs.

Run. Fast.

How often are you asked to have your brain picked? Got any words of advice or examples to share?

Remember, nothing is for free — you just aren’t paying for it.

 Comments | Comment

Why I Dislike Flash

There’s been some hubbub going around about how Flash won’t be included on the iPad, mainly because Steve Jobs considers it a memory hog and unneeded once there are other ways to play online video.

While he did claim that Flash would drain the battery of an iPad from 10 hours to 1.5 hours, here’s an interesting stat:

Battery life on newer MacBook Pros has been  as shrinking by over an hour with Flash active, although the faster processors and added memory help absorb some of the performance concerns.

Outside of playing video, run of the mill HTML with Javascript libraries is more than enough for most websites. If you have a technology that’s draining systems that much, is it really worth supporting?

Flash is buggy and a memory hog and consequently a poor user experience.

This seems to be the biggest complaint. Microsoft tries to make Flash play well with Windows even though they have their own product, Silverlight. Most online video requires a Flash player, so they have to support it. The bottom line: operating system developers are maintaining changes for a plug in because the developer isn’t doing their job or someone else other than the author is supporting technology needs.

It’s a hard job making it work with all of the browsers and platforms but in all honesty, Adobe decided to pick that battle when they bought Macromedia. I have a MacBook Pro and a Sony loaded with tons of RAM, and I’ve still experienced browser freezes on Mac OS X, Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 across Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Chrome. For it to not work and crash on so many systems, that’s just sloppy development and an  embarrassment  to Adobe.

I recently tried to do some remote usability testing using DimDim, a free service. They have a Flash-based conferencing product that allows you to do screen sharing. Although not a trivial task from a programming point of view, but Adobe supports it. After 30 minutes, we could not get it to work, so now I’m using GoToMeeting.

Honestly, it was a buggy issue. Every time the browser tried to launch, it crashed. That said, the number one rule of User Experience should be: “If it crashes, the user has a poor experience.” Adobe, with their wonderful graphics applications, should understand it. I have no idea how many quality assurance people are on Flash, but they need more.

Flash confuses users.

During the DimDim installation, there’s a security dialog that is run-of-the-mill for us Internet-types but most users freak out and want to go home. The person I was testing kept canceling at that point. Just recently, I was talking to a video publisher who said that at that point, 50 percent of the users that attempt to share video cancel the action at the security dialog.

I’ve been seeing confusing error messages on several sites, Mashable being one of them, about “security issues” regarding Flash. I selected the “Settings” button on the dialog and was redirected to the Adobe site. I found this dialog confusing, and I consider myself a Web Expert. Can you imagine most of the people on the Web trying to figure this out?

Outside of online video and some Flex apps, Flash isn’t needed.

It is very easy to encode video with Flash, but outside of online video and a few Flex apps like TweetDeck, I personally have no use for Flash. HTML with jQuery achieves most, if not all, of the user interface needs I need to do elegant UX work.

The Virgin America decision to not use Flash on their site is a great example. They have a clean, easy-to-use site and a user base that is highly connected to mobile and, more importantly, the iPhone. To book a flight, does someone really need a full video with spinning cursors and animating tabs to pick the best time to fly from LAX to JFK?

No.

It becomes a simple business decision for a company like Virgin America. There are 70 million iPhone users. They represent over 60 percent of the mobile web traffic.  Apple won’t support Flash — guess what? No Flash for Virgin America. If I were a Product Manager on a site that had a highly mobile component and made a decision to ignore those 70 million or so iPhone users (most of whom seriously make good money and like to spend it on toys like the iPhone), I should be fired.

The upside — Flash is on the way out.

HTML 5 apparently has support for video without Flash. YouTube is running a beta now if you use Chrome, Firefox and the Chrome plug-in on Internet Explorer). If you take away some of the ads and do most of the normal animations using jQuery, what do you really need Flash for?

 Comments | Comment

Mobile Social Networking Up For Everyone Except for MySpace

From comScore:

The study found that 30.8 percent of smartphone users accessed social networking sites via their mobile browser in January 2010, up 8.3 points from 22.5 percent one year ago. Access to Facebook via mobile browser grew 112 percent in the past year, while Twitter experienced a 347-percent jump.

“Social networking remains one of the most popular and fastest-growing behaviors on both the PC-based Internet and the mobile Web,” said Mark Donovan, comScore senior vice president of mobile. “Social media is a natural sweet spot for mobile since mobile devices are at the center of how people communicate with their circle of friends, whether by phone, text, email, or, increasingly, accessing social networking sites via a mobile browser.”

All channels, all devices, baby.

  • 30% of smartphone users accessed social networks via mobile browsers – this was up from 22.5% in 2009.
  • Total social networking access via mobile browsers on all mobile phones rose to 11.1% – this was up from 6.5% in 2009. Most of this growth was in the uptick in smartphone usage.

How does MySpace survive if their mobile-centric audience uses their mobile site less?

 Comments | Comment

How To Increase Conversion: Red Buttons

This became an inside joke I at the Online Marketing Summit, one of my clients. I was doing the drinking thang (networking, talking with attendees), and I always have one gimmick that I go with at an event as an icebreaker.

The joke was, “so how do you increase conversion?”

“Red Buttons.”

I’m sure Red Buttons the comedian didn’t know he was going to be the punchline for a user experience jokes. “I’m here on Tuesdays, tip your waitress, next up They Might Be Giants…”

But…

That’s not always the case, as stated in this great tool that’s been around for a year, Which Test Won.

Which Test Won is a great little site that does what we all want: publish the results of A/B tests for ideas of better site conversion.

In the red button/grey button test, Verizon tried two versions of a home page, one with red buttons everywhere, and one with a single red button. The main call to action was a gray button.

Can you guess which one won? Go to the site to see.

 Comments | Comment