<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Counts &#124; User Experience, Social Media &#187; LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/tag/linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com</link>
	<description>Usability, User Experience, Social Media, and Content Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:45:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>QuickTip Sundays: FaceBook, MySpace, LinkedIn</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/08/31/quicktip-sundays-facebook-myspace-linkedin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/08/31/quicktip-sundays-facebook-myspace-linkedin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QuickTip Sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s Missing From This List? Groups. All three of them have groups has major functionality, and none of the three have added groups as a component of the top or main navigation. Since all three of the services need advertising and page views to a certain extent, you would think each would try to drive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_385" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 470px"><a href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/facebook_nav.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-385" title="facebook_nav" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/facebook_nav.gif" alt="Facebook Navigation" width="460" height="30" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Facebook Navigation</p></div>
<div id="attachment_386" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 470px"><a href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/myspace_nav.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-386" title="myspace_nav" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/myspace_nav.gif" alt="MySpace Navigation" width="460" height="42" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">MySpace Navigation</p></div>
<div id="attachment_387" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 470px"><a href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/linkedin_nav.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-387" title="linkedin_nav" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/linkedin_nav.gif" alt="LinkedIn Navigation" width="460" height="36" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">LinkedIn Navigation</p></div>
<h3>What&#8217;s Missing From This List?</h3>
<p>Groups. All three of them have groups has major functionality, and none of the three have added groups as a component of the top or main navigation. Since all three of the services need advertising and page views to a certain extent, you would think each would try to drive traffic to groups.</p>
<p>My opinion? I think groups are underused; with the right approach, groups could be mini social networks upon themselves. For the services above, maybe they haven&#8217;t gotten there. But, if they could increase traffic in highly targeted and focused groups, why don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/08/31/quicktip-sundays-facebook-myspace-linkedin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Spam Of Facebook And The Usefulness Of Web Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/04/21/the-spam-of-facebook-and-the-usefulness-of-web-application/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/04/21/the-spam-of-facebook-and-the-usefulness-of-web-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Adoption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have this standard joke because it&#8217;s my line of work, which really didn&#8217;t exist too long ago: &#8220;The internet&#8217;s a fad, it&#8217;s just going to go away.&#8221; While it might be dramatizing it, I do feel that it is if we don&#8217;t improve the user experience of applications and websites, like Facebook, so they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this standard joke because it&#8217;s my line of work, which really didn&#8217;t exist too long ago: &#8220;The internet&#8217;s a fad, it&#8217;s just going to go away.&#8221; While it might be dramatizing it, I do feel that it is if we don&#8217;t improve the user experience of applications and websites, like Facebook, so they aren&#8217;t just marketing spam. While end users may not be the brightest bulbs in the world, they&#8217;re not stupid, and they know when they are being fooled.</p>
<p>I like FaceBook. I&#8217;ve hired people off of FaceBook, and find it more useful from a profile standpoint (but less entertaining) than MySpace, but not as useful as LinkedIn. However, I had to do some housecleaning the other day, and I deleted over 100 applications.</p>
<p>Part of the problem is how most of these application developers design the applications, and nothing is a better illustration than what my online budy <a href="http://netzoo.net/facebook-by-adding-this-app-you-agree-to-be-used-in-an-ad/">Andy Sternberg pointed out using an application</a> on my own profile &#8212; that since I&#8217;ve installed an application, there&#8217;s this implicit &#8220;wow, Patrick must really like it.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t like it. My friends are selling me, and I&#8217;m not getting any of the profits.</p>
<p>A lot of these applications and even some websites, like <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/2008/04/17/reunion-com-spamming-your-address-book-without-your-permission/" target="_blank">Reunion.com</a> (I&#8217;m not just bringing them up because I interviewed there years ago, but because I know the CEO knows better, and the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus16apr16,1,4041604,full.column" target="_blank">David Lazarus of the Los Angeles Times</a> also brought it up) are using shady ways to promote themselves, like harvesting friend lists and so on.</p>
<p>Note to application developers &#8212; if the applications are usable, engaging, and cool, people will use it in droves. They&#8217;ll tell your friends. They won&#8217;t worry about being forced to tell 10, or 12, or 20 friends. Facebook probably doesn&#8217;t know how it&#8217;s <a href="http://bub.blicio.us/?p=867" target="_blank">damaging their reputation</a>, or if they do know, how to fix it.</p>
<p>That Scrabbulous application is engaging.</p>
<p>Texas No-Hold &#8216;Em Poker is engaging.</p>
<p>FriendFeed is engaging.</p>
<p>Selling friends is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/04/21/the-spam-of-facebook-and-the-usefulness-of-web-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.336 seconds -->
