<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Counts &#124; User Experience, Social Media &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/tag/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com</link>
	<description>Usability, User Experience, Social Media, and Content Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:45:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>QuickTip Sundays: SixRevisions And The Lack Of Search</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/11/02/quicktip-sundays-sixrevisions-and-the-lack-of-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/11/02/quicktip-sundays-sixrevisions-and-the-lack-of-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QuickTip Sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you run a blog, there should be a search box somewhere on the site I might have written another post about this &#8212; it might have been Baseball Prospectus &#8212; where I described the issue where search was confusing because there were too many different ways. In their case it&#8217;s probably a technical issue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sixrevisions.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-677" title="sixrevisions" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sixrevisions.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="137" /></a></p>
<h3>If you run a blog, there should be a search box somewhere on the site</h3>
<p>I might have written another post about this &#8212; it might have been Baseball Prospectus &#8212; where I described the issue where search was confusing because there were too many different ways. In their case it&#8217;s probably a technical issue because they&#8217;re on some custom hacked together content management system.</p>
<p>Six Revisions is different: they&#8217;re on WordPress, which has search right out of the box (notice the search box I have on this site, nice and big). Yet, there&#8217;s no way to search the site except through using google. It&#8217;s really disappointing, because the content is off the charts, and I was going to find a Photoshop article along the lines of their Illustrator article to send to a friend, but I can&#8217;t. I have to browse through their archives; this increases page views, but I don&#8217;t want to take the time.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple: blog readers sometimes want to see what&#8217;s on the inside, and the easiest way to do it is either through free form search, or through tag clouds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/11/02/quicktip-sundays-sixrevisions-and-the-lack-of-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QuickTip Sundays: Baseball Prospectus</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/10/05/quicktip-sundays-baseball-prospectus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/10/05/quicktip-sundays-baseball-prospectus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QuickTip Sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search should be intuitive I watch baseball. A lot of baseball. And I&#8217;m in a fantasy league, so I read a lot alot about baseball. Because of this Baseball Prospectus is a site I subscribe to because the content is top-notch analysis. If though it doesn&#8217;t help me much, there&#8217;s a lot of information about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/baseballprospectuscom.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-578" title="baseballprospectuscom" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/baseballprospectuscom.gif" alt="" width="460" height="75" /></a></p>
<h3>Search should be intuitive</h3>
<p>I watch baseball. A lot of baseball. And I&#8217;m in a fantasy league, so I read a lot alot about baseball. Because of this Baseball Prospectus is a site I subscribe to because the content is top-notch analysis. If though it doesn&#8217;t help me much, there&#8217;s a lot of information about teams and players that&#8217;s very insightful.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I like.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t like is their search interface &#8212; it&#8217;s hard to figure out how to get to certain articles, and everything is separated. Click on the search link above, and it sends you to a complex advanced search page. Finding a player is pretty self explanitory, but the Audit Team doesn&#8217;t mean anything to me.</p>
<p>Remember, users are looking for one search box, and it should be designed to intuitively go to results based on what they expect. In this case, I would expect a search box that would show me all results (&#8220;Google-style&#8221;), and then I could filter on players based on direct and indirect matches. What is here now doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/10/05/quicktip-sundays-baseball-prospectus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QuickTip Sundays: Hulu</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/06/15/quicktip-sundays-hulu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/06/15/quicktip-sundays-hulu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QuickTip Sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#8217;s The Search Box? Hulu&#8216;s a pretty good site &#8212; lots of video from companies that want some kind of control over the content, which is much more than YouTube is giving them. The site&#8217;s is version 1.0, so the interface feels a bit clunky. Most importantly, where&#8217;s the search box? I made the screen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hulu.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-111" title="hulu" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hulu.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="410" /></a></p>
<h3>Where&#8217;s The Search Box?</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.hulu.com" target="_blank">Hulu</a>&#8216;s a pretty good site &#8212; lots of video from companies that want some kind of control over the content, which is much more than YouTube is giving them. The site&#8217;s is version 1.0, so the interface feels a bit clunky. Most importantly, where&#8217;s the search box?</p>
<p>I made the screen capture small without a highlight for the primary reason that if you are on a content-heavy site, that search box better be easy to find. Like Google easy to find. Like YouTube easy to find. Like News.com easy to find.</p>
<p>Can you find it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/06/15/quicktip-sundays-hulu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.464 seconds -->
