<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Counts &#187; Typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/tag/typography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com</link>
	<description>Usability, User Experience, Social Media, and Content Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Silly Saturdays: Cheese or Font?</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/09/26/silly-saturdays-cheese-or-font/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/09/26/silly-saturdays-cheese-or-font/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyn Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Silly Saturdays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=1767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow up to my previous post about typography, I&#8217;d like to share a fun game called &#8220;Cheese or Font?&#8221; The concept is pretty simple: the site presents you with a word and you have to decide if it&#8217;s a cheese or a font. Pretty brilliant and hilarious, if you ask me. See the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- this will appear at the top of the post -->As a follow up to my previous post about typography, I&#8217;d like to share a fun game called <a href="http://cheeseorfont.com/">&#8220;Cheese or Font?&#8221;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cheeseorfont.com/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1769" src="http://www.usabilitycounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cheeseorfont.png" alt="cheeseorfont" width="400" height="172" /></a></p>
<p>The concept is pretty simple: the site presents you with a word and you have to decide if it&#8217;s a cheese or a font. Pretty brilliant and hilarious, if you ask me.</p>
<p>See the less PC, but just as fun(ny): <a href="http://steakhouseorgaybar.com/">Steakhouse or Gay Bar?</a><!-- this will appear at the bottom of the post --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/09/26/silly-saturdays-cheese-or-font/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typographic Design Patterns and Best Practices from the Best Blogs of Today</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/09/15/typographic-design-patterns-and-best-practices-from-the-best-blogs-of-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/09/15/typographic-design-patterns-and-best-practices-from-the-best-blogs-of-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyn Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite topics is typography and even though there&#8217;s a somewhat limited set of options in CSS, typography can still vary tremendously using pure CSS syntax. Smashing Magazine conducted a detailed survey of 50 popular websites to see answer questions like Serif or sans-serif? Large or small font? Light or dark background? and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- this will appear at the top of the post -->One of my favorite topics is typography and even though there&#8217;s a somewhat limited set of options in CSS, typography can still vary tremendously using pure CSS syntax. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/20/typographic-design-survey-best-practices-from-the-best-blogs/">Smashing Magazine conducted a detailed survey of 50 popular websites</a> to see answer questions like Serif or sans-serif? Large or small font? Light or dark background? and more.  </p>
<p>Though the findings aren&#8217;t scientific, the study shows a clear set of common practices and guidelines for setting type in Web design. Granted, these points should serve only as rough guidelines (not hard and fast rules):</p>
<blockquote><p>
   1. Either serif or sans-serif fonts are fine for body copy and headings, but sans-serif fonts are still more popular for both.<br />
   2. Common choices for headlines are Georgia, Arial and Helvetica.<br />
   3. Common choices for body copy are Georgia, Arial, Verdana and Lucida Grande.<br />
   4. The most popular font size for headings is a range between 18 and 29 pixels.<br />
   5. The most popular font size for body copy is a range between 12 and 14 pixels.<br />
   6. Header font size ÷ Body copy font size = 1.96.<br />
   7. Line height (pixels) ÷ body copy font size (pixels) = 1.48.<br />
   8. Line length (pixels) ÷ line height (pixels) = 27.8.<br />
   9. Space between paragraphs (pixels) ÷ line height (pixels) = 0.754.<br />
  10. The optimal number of characters per line is between 55 and 75, but between 75 and 85 characters per line is more popular,<br />
  11. Body text is left-aligned, image replacement is rarely used and links are either underlined or highlighted with bold or color.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, every website is unique, and few people want their sites to look like everyone else&#8217;s sites.  But it&#8217;s always great to keep in mind that following these guidelines could make your website feel more familiar to your readers.  (If you are a data and spreadsheet nerd like I am, check out <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AsK4MoYiBVMldE12V3FJYk95YVRUZ18xNDJNOVRrSHc&amp;hl=de">the spreadsheet</a> of the study and export its data for further analysis.)<!-- this will appear at the bottom of the post --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/09/15/typographic-design-patterns-and-best-practices-from-the-best-blogs-of-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool Website Tuesdays: The League Of Movable Type</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/05/19/cool-website-tuesdays-the-league-of-movable-type/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/05/19/cool-website-tuesdays-the-league-of-movable-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Website Tuesdays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m kind of conflicted about Open Source, but at least for fonts The League Of Movable Type has a cool website. Maybe for true typography on the web, they can advance the cause. Their manifesto: We are Caroline and Micah, the founders of The League. As designers on the web, we have a calling to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- this will appear at the top of the post -->I&#8217;m kind of conflicted about Open Source, but at least for fonts <a href="http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/" target="_blank">The League Of Movable Type</a> has a cool website. Maybe for true typography on the web, they can advance the cause.</p>
<p>Their manifesto:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are Caroline and Micah, the founders of The League. As designers on the web, we have a calling to raise the standards of the web-design world. We&#8217;re not the only ones who value good design, and it&#8217;s time for the web world to catch up with it. We understand the challenges that comes with the internet, but with our recent discovery of @font-face, we started getting excited. For those who aren&#8217;t up to speed, @font-face is a fairly new addition to web styling, letting a designer specify the location of their own font files. Instead of having to design with just a handful of web-friendly fonts, we&#8217;ll be able to use any typeface we desire. Well, that&#8217;s our vision, anyway.</p></blockquote>
<p><!-- this will appear at the bottom of the post --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2009/05/19/cool-website-tuesdays-the-league-of-movable-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Web Going To International Typographic Style? It&#8217;s About Really Clean Design.</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/07/02/the-web-going-to-international-typographic-style-its-about-really-clean-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/07/02/the-web-going-to-international-typographic-style-its-about-really-clean-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have this love affair with Helvetica (note, I said Helvetica, not that bastard child, Arial) and other really clean type styles. It&#8217;s one of the reason I&#8217;m kind of futzing with this site on a semi-regular basis &#8212; I&#8217;m trying to get that perfect look typographically, and it will always be a work in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- this will appear at the top of the post -->I have this love affair with Helvetica (note, I said Helvetica, not that bastard child, Arial) and other really clean type styles. It&#8217;s one of the reason I&#8217;m kind of futzing with this site on a semi-regular basis &#8212; I&#8217;m trying to get that perfect look typographically, and it will always be a work in progress.</p>
<p>Along those same lines, Samantha Warren has a great blog post where <a href="http://www.badassideas.com/blog/2008/07/01/the-evolution-of-the-international-typographic-style-from-print-to-web/" target="_blank">she talks about the shift of the web</a> to clean, international typographic style, which basically emphasizes simple geometrics and focuses on minimalism. They point to <a href="http://informationarchitects.jp/" target="_blank">iA Japan</a> as an example of gorgeous design. I agree. iA Japan has another great read about typography, <a href="http://informationarchitects.jp/the-web-is-all-about-typography-period/" target="_blank">how the web is 95 percent tyopgraphy</a>. Agreed there too.<!-- this will appear at the bottom of the post --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/07/02/the-web-going-to-international-typographic-style-its-about-really-clean-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Typography Is Dead! Long Live Web Typography!</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/05/14/great-web-typography-found-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/05/14/great-web-typography-found-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Neeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycounts.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a print guy, and I&#8217;ve always felt that typography, because of the limited nature of what you could use, was actually harder and more valuable on the web. One of the favorite blogs, i love typography, agrees, and they published a great entry of some examples of effective web typography and design.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- this will appear at the top of the post -->I&#8217;m a print guy, and I&#8217;ve always felt that typography, because of the limited nature of what you could use, was actually harder and more valuable on the web. One of the favorite blogs, i love typography, agrees, and they published a great entry of <a href="http://ilovetypography.com/2008/05/07/15-great-examples-of-web-typography-q2-2008/" target="_blank">some examples of effective web typography and design</a>.<!-- this will appear at the bottom of the post --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usabilitycounts.com/2008/05/14/great-web-typography-found-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

